Comments on: Shameful Admissions http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/ Text with bedhead Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:26:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: T. Gold http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1910 T. Gold Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:45:42 +0000 http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1910 it somewhat shames _me_ to say this, but i haven't rewatched it in at least two years. from what i recall, i liked the art a lot, and how the dialogue and action gave the characters a lot of depth (for me) while remaining fairly simple. might be time for me to watch it again! it somewhat shames me to say this, but i haven’t rewatched it in at least two years. from what i recall, i liked the art a lot, and how the dialogue and action gave the characters a lot of depth (for me) while remaining fairly simple. might be time for me to watch it again!

]]> By: pts http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1872 pts Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:03:55 +0000 http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1872 I may try again, but it just seemed like random self-indulgent wackiness to me. What did _you_ like about it? I may try again, but it just seemed like random self-indulgent wackiness to me. What did you like about it?

]]> By: T. Gold http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1868 T. Gold Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:43:39 +0000 http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1868 sad. well, i guess it's not for everyone. you tried. :] sad. well, i guess it’s not for everyone. you tried. :]

]]> By: pts http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1867 pts Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:01:40 +0000 http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1867 Subbed. That was the "official" English title, so I assumed that's what it was called here. Subbed. That was the “official” English title, so I assumed that’s what it was called here.

]]> By: T. Gold http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1859 T. Gold Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:30:24 +0000 http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1859 er, did you watch Furi Kuri dubbed or subbed? judging by "Fooly Cooly" i would think dubbed... which might explain the not-seeing of genius. er, did you watch Furi Kuri dubbed or subbed? judging by “Fooly Cooly” i would think dubbed… which might explain the not-seeing of genius.

]]> By: Dr. Greg http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1595 Dr. Greg Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:07:06 +0000 http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1595 I believe even 0**0 = 1 (I think that's the FORTRAN exponentiation operator). Thats zero to the zeroth power equals one. Never proved it, but I think it can be done using factorials. I believe even 0**0 = 1 (I think that’s the FORTRAN exponentiation operator). Thats zero to the zeroth power equals one. Never proved it, but I think it can be done using factorials.

]]> By: pts http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1561 pts Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:42:08 +0000 http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1561 Yeah, everything gets formatted in textile, including comments. Never thought to mention it. I edited your comment to work properly (I think) but the upshot is if you use a carat to start an exponent, you have to delimit it with a trailing carat. Yeah, everything gets formatted in textile, including comments. Never thought to mention it. I edited your comment to work properly (I think) but the upshot is if you use a carat to start an exponent, you have to delimit it with a trailing carat.

]]> By: fluffy http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1555 fluffy Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:24:39 +0000 http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1555 Wow, you have some weird formatting module which tries to deal with exponentiation but doesn't do it right. testtest Wow, you have some weird formatting module which tries to deal with exponentiation but doesn’t do it right.

testtest

]]> By: fluffy http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1554 fluffy Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:22:30 +0000 http://www.midaregami.net/log/2007/02/24/shameful-admissions/#comment-1554 Axioms: 1. n^a^ * n^b^ = n^(a+b^) 2. n^-1^ = 1/n 3. n^1^ = n Derivation: 4. n^0^= n^(-1 + 1)^ 5. n^(-1 + 1)^ = n^-1^ * n^1^ [1] 6. n^-1^ * n^1^ = 1/n * n [2,3] Therefore, n^0 = n/n = 1 (if n != 0) [4, 6] Axioms:
1. na * nb = n(a+b)
2. n-1 = 1/n
3. n1 = n

Derivation:
4. n0= n(-1 + 1)
5. n(-1 + 1) = n-1 * n1 [1]
6. n-1 * n1 = 1/n * n [2,3]
Therefore, n^0 = n/n = 1 (if n != 0) [4, 6]

]]>